Class Diagnostic
Mathematics
Kishamba · Grade 6 · 2026 · 11 learners
All 4 content areas need attention. Data Handling is the weakest content area — confidence interval lower bound at 0%.
Sitting average: 28.4% — descriptive only, not a mastery score.
Kishamba Grade 6 Maths: Overall Performance Near Chance Level
The overall mean score for Grade 6 Mathematics is 28.4%, which is close to the 25% chance level for a 4-choice multiple-choice assessment. Three out of four curriculum strands assessed are performing at-risk, with Data Handling showing the lowest mastery. All learners are currently performing below the secure threshold on this sitting.
The assessment relied heavily on single questions per topic, which provides very sparse data for each area. A closer look at the conditions under which this assessment was administered would help, given the overall results.
Primary analysis
Content area mastery
Sorted from weakest to strongest — CI lower bound tells you the most you can confidently rule out.
Strands = the CBC content areas that make up this subject. Performance is reported per strand because a subject-wide average hides where the gap actually is.
1 learning outcome
10 learning outcomes
33 learning outcomes
1 learning outcome
Prerequisite gaps
Foundational skills to re-assess
These prerequisite skills connect to multiple later outcomes. A gap here can cascade. Evidence is limited — treat as a prompt to re-assess, not a diagnosis.
Foundational prerequisite
Identify place value of decimals up to thousandths in different situations (G5)
Connects to 33 later outcomes. 90% gap on this item — worth re-assessing before building on it. low-confidence 1 question
Foundational prerequisite
Multiply up to a 3 digit number by up to a 2 digit number in real life situations (G5)
Connects to 19 later outcomes. 79% gap on this item — worth re-assessing before building on it.
Foundational prerequisite
Convert kilometres to metres and metres to kilometres in different situations (G5)
Connects to 19 later outcomes. 80% gap on this item — worth re-assessing before building on it. low-confidence 1 question
Curriculum insight
Gateway concepts for Mathematics
Learning outcomes that unlock the most downstream learning across all grades.
Instrument note
What this assessment tested
This assessment mostly sampled Apply and Understand — it does not test higher-order skills. Absence from the assessment is not evidence learners cannot perform those tasks.
All learning outcomes (45) — single-question data, directional only
Most outcomes below are covered by just 1–2 questions. These numbers describe what learners scored on those specific items — not whether they have mastered the outcome. Use strands above for diagnostic confidence.
Interpretation guide
How to read this report
median 1 question/LO → per-LO is item-evidence not mastery; mastery claims at strand; 2026 harder next-grade paper; misconceptions are distractor hypotheses.
Sparsity note: outcomes with 1 question cannot support diagnostic conclusions — the 1 question — directional only tag marks these throughout.